Deaf Pupil Education and Social Services
Course Evaluation
Wednesday 24 November 2004
Number of Participants: 12 Number of Respondents: 11
Overall Assessment:
How would you rate the following: Excellent = 1; Poor = 5
1 2 3 4 5 Organisation of the course/event 2 Content and supplementary material 1.91 Clarity of presentation 1.54 Pacing of course/event 1.91 Overall evaluation 1.82 Highland's presentation/information as good model of practice. The morning input was excellent - informative and useful. Morning presentation was best, very informative. Afternoon was good but could
have done with one speaker for one stage instead of shared. I enjoyed the morning because there was 2 deaf presenters. In afternoon
it is really specific for the teachers and social workers, not for
auxiliaries but did enjoy it. Hearing about Deaf Action and services from a deaf viewpoint. Very practical
presentation from Highland - a great pity there were no other people from Edinburgh! Plenty of information and enthusiasm from presenters. The enthusiasm and commitment of the speakers pm was excellent. Interesting presentation from Deaf Action about what's happening now and future. Got
some useful facts. Not clear enough what the presentation trying to aim. Useful
to see examples/Deaf issues/situation - that's understanding. The whole perspective was interesting and useful. Illustrations of how well co-ordinated Deaf Education and Social Services
are in Highland - a model for us to follow. Practical strategies for greater joint working and focus on outcomes for children. Examples
from Highland Council excellent. Afternoon input rambled too much - could have been more concise. More breaks in between. The interpreters come from England and it would be better Scottish interpreters
because of our accent. It was not very clear from the title and description on leaflet, what the
course actually involved. I think more people would have been interested
if the content had been more specifically described. Very small complaint - what about something to eat with coffee - scone, biscuit!! Overall whole day - structure/aims/objectives not clear or explained properly
what the speakers to talk about. Also interpreters need to be polished/trained
as they were using English signs causing some confusion/misunderstanding. Provision of water, tea/coffee. More focus on specific practice relating to joint working rather than lengthy
description on structure of teams in Edinburgh which are not relevant to people
from other parts of the country and would already be known to most participants. I felt the interpreters were missing vital information for the deaf people. Also,
their voiceover because noticed she mentioned will but the deaf
presenter signed MUST. It would be better if all information
right. I did not receive a map - but not a big problem! Feel it was too long - concentration span is limited. Food and drink
provisions not satisfactory for the money we pay. Was it worth 80? Also
disappointed with the turnout of people/professionals. It is a pity there were no other Social Work Departments represented. In
fact it's a pity the whole day was so poorly attended. The varying structures of social services across authorities makes it difficult
to achieve the ideal. My Authority no longer has a dedicated social services
team for the under 16 deaf population. Generic children and families disability
teams do not have the specialised knowledge and skills re deafness.
What was best about the course/event?
What could have been better?
Any other comments
