Impact Questionnaire Results 2006-07
Questions
- This course has strongly improved my understanding of concepts and principles in this field.
- The course reading materials (handouts, etc) have been used and referred to since the course.
- The course provided something new that I could use in my professional practice.
- The course had a positive impact on my daily professional practice.
- I have implemented parts of the course into my daily professional practice.
- The course was a valuable use of my CPD time.
- I would recommend SSC courses to colleagues.
1. Course 3: Including Deaf Children in Mainstream Schools (38 Attendees: 34 Teachers)
|
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Not sure |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
Responses |
Q1 |
7 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
|
17 |
Q2 |
4 |
7 |
2 |
4 |
|
17 |
Q3 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
17 |
Q4 |
7 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
|
17 |
Q5 |
6 |
7 |
2 |
2 |
|
17 |
Q6 |
6 |
8 |
1 |
|
1 |
16 |
Q7 |
6 |
10 |
|
|
1 |
17 |
Other Comments:
- Excellent course - great variety of speakers. Also good variety of people attending the course.
- I have since completed BSL Level 1 and feel that this course has encouraged me to do this.
- Courses like this are very worthwhile for our professional practice. It is essential to have opportunities to meet with other professionals and share expertise at courses like this.
- Since attending the course, my class group has changed so I no longer have a hearing impaired pupil. However the principles of inclusion and awareness of sensory impairments is useful to my own professional development.
- Found it invaluable as I had little experience of working with children with hearing difficulties.
- Within our authority we provide quality in-service training for mainstream colleagues and associates. I attended this course believing it was connected to the findings of the NDCS/HMIE research. As this was not the case I concluded that our local course was much better and did not stay for the afternoon session.
- Re Q6 this course was during my teaching day so cannot be counted as CPD time.
- I felt the course was aimed for teachers who have not had much experience of deaf education. Therefore, I don't feel I learned anything new but it did provide a good networking/discussion base.
- The problem was that most of this was already known. Perhaps the target audience could have been defined more precisely.
- The course enabled me to work more effectively with other agencies for the good of all children in my class.
2. Course 7: Play and Communication with Pupils with Visual Impairment and Additional Support Needs (22 Attendees: 15 Teachers)
|
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Not sure |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
Responses |
Q1 |
2 |
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
Q2 |
2 |
5 |
|
2 |
|
9 |
Q3 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
|
|
9 |
Q4 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
|
|
9 |
Q5 |
2 |
6 |
|
|
|
8 |
Q6 |
3 |
6 |
|
|
|
9 |
Q7 |
7 |
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
Other Comments:
- Course confirmed that I am using appropriate methods in my daily practice. Courses such as these are very useful for networking with other professionals in a similar field.
- Really enjoyed the course at the time - it's hard to remember details now! Would have used new knowledge if I had been visiting children with VI but haven't had any. Also enjoyed meeting other professionals during course. Would like to attend similar courses if any coming up.
- The children I am dealing with this year are not visually impaired, but aspects of the course were and are valuable to my caseload.
3. Course 10: Functional Assessment of Vision (47 Day 1, 39 Day 2 Attendees: 29 Teachers)
|
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Not sure |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
Responses |
Q1 |
5 |
9 |
|
2 |
|
16 |
Q2 |
1 |
13 |
2 |
1 |
|
17 |
Q3 |
4 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
|
17 |
Q4 |
4 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
|
17 |
Q5 |
1 |
14 |
2 |
|
|
17 |
Q6 |
4 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
|
17 |
Q7 |
6 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
|
17 |
Other Comments:
- I would like to be kept updated on all other visual courses.
- Thank you for continuing to organise courses for VI teachers and others, and for following up on their suggestions.
- Delivery was excellent. Good mixture of academic and practical aspects of assessment.
- Unlike the other course I attended, which was excellent, I did not find the structure and content helpful. I needed step-by-step instructions and explanations on how to administer assessments, not just vague 'have a look through' activity.
- It was good to attend a course that was so relevant to my job. Useful for chartered teaching claim too.
- Not really my professional practice and that of my team.
- I'm sorry I can't attend more courses!
- I would have expected more direct teaching of how each assessment is carried out, rather than putting the assessments out on tables and looking through them.
- The course has made me question whether to move onto studying for the Diploma. The course provided an insight but made me realise I need to study further to grasp essential understanding of VI children in the classroom.
Course 13: Deaf Plus: Teaching Deaf Children who are Dyslexic (30 Attendees: 19 Teachers)
|
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Not sure |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
Responses |
Q1 |
2 |
8 |
1 |
|
|
11 |
Q2 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
Q3 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
Q4 |
1 |
6 |
3 |
|
1 |
11 |
Q5 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
10 |
Q6 |
2 |
7 |
2 |
|
|
11 |
Q7 |
3 |
7 |
1 |
|
|
11 |
Other Comments:
- I already had a qualification in Dyslexia and was looking for the Deaf dimension to this and didn't feel that it really delivered that.
- Very little practical advice given in how to deal with secondary age, deaf, dyslexic pupils.
- I think there is a lot of misunderstanding in this area and I think it's good to have the time to discuss and the people to discuss it with - also with the added difficulty of deafness diagnosis is always more complicated.
- Thank you. I enjoyed the course. Still trying to implement parts into daily practice. Intend to work with a teacher of the deaf (I am teacher - Dyslexia) to come up with an approach for assessment and strategies for working with deaf/dyslexic children.
